68/ 100
Overall sample score
Illustrative scoring structureILLUSTRATIVE · REDACTED SAMPLE
Investment Agent Evaluation Report
A compact example of how DuoTopo turns one pre-market answer into an evidence-linked expert assessment—without future information and without rewriting the original response.
Expert conclusion
Useful research foundation, but not execution-ready
The Agent identified the central theme, yet converted a broad narrative into a trade recommendation before defining confirmation, invalidation, or the cost of being wrong.
Primary failure modeNarrative recognition was stronger than decision discipline.
Evidence chain
The judgment remains traceable from input to validation
Time Capsule
Only information available before the open is restored and locked.
Agent Answer
The original answer is preserved with its direction, grade, trigger and risk language.
Expert Review
Evaluators compare claims with the locked evidence and identify decision failure modes.
Market Validation
Close, T+1 and T+2 are appended later; they never rewrite the original answer.
01 · SCORECARD
Ex-Ante scorecard
Each score is tied to reviewable evidence—not generated from returns alone.
Research quality14 / 20
Recognized the dominant AI-demand narrative and linked it to the relevant industry chain.
Market-context understanding10 / 15
Understood the broad risk backdrop but underweighted long-end-rate pressure.
Risk identification12 / 15
Mentioned volatility, but did not translate it into a decision constraint.
Opportunity grading6 / 15
Confidence was upgraded without enough evidence to justify the stronger grade.
Trigger quality5 / 15
No observable confirmation threshold was defined before action.
Invalidation4 / 10
The answer lacked a clear condition that would disprove the thesis.
Communication7 / 10
Readable and concise, but the final action sounded more certain than the evidence.
02 · Auditable excerpts
What the Agent said—and what the evaluator found
“The AI-infrastructure narrative remains constructive. The Agent recommends acting before the open because the long-term demand story is intact.”
The answer moved from a valid long-term narrative to an immediate action without specifying price confirmation, relative strength, invalidation, or why pre-market timing was necessary.
What worked
- Correctly identified the dominant narrative
- Connected sector and company context
- Kept the answer concise and decision-oriented
What failed
- Narrative was treated as a trigger
- No observable invalidation condition
- Opportunity grade exceeded the evidence
03 · Improvement plan
Three changes that would materially improve the Agent
Separate thesis from timing
Keep the long-term narrative, but require an independent opening trigger before recommending action.
Make confidence falsifiable
Attach every grade to observable confirmation and invalidation conditions.
Allow No Trade
When evidence does not support timing, preserve the thesis while returning a valid no-trade decision.
04 · Ex-Post layer
Outcome evidence is appended—not backfilled into the original judgment
Direction held, but the expected strength did not fully appear.
The required follow-through was absent; the stronger grade was not supported.
The narrative remained relevant, while the original timing logic remained invalid.
This page is an illustrative, redacted product sample. Names, excerpts and scores demonstrate the report structure and do not represent a real client, a real Agent submission, or investment advice.
What a real engagement adds
A real report includes the submitted Agent answer, locked market evidence, evaluator citations, scoring rationale and prioritized improvement recommendations.